Monday, September 15, 2014

The Aviation Industry: An Economist's Perspective

Far too many industries have good reason for caution at the moment, given the fears of a "double dip" in the world economy. But the mood in aviation, especially among the aircraftmakers, remains optimistic. This week Airbus produced new long-range forecasts, predicting that a combination of vigorous emerging-market growth and the need to replace ageing and inefficient planes in the rich countries will mean a demand, between now and 2030, for almost 28,000 large aircraft (passenger planes with over 100 seats, plus freighters) worth $3.5 trillion. Airbus's archrival, Boeing, is even more boosterish: it predicted earlier this month that there would be demand for around 31,000 planes, worth $4 trillion, by 2030. Both planemakers are already seeing signs of this in their bulging order books. This bodes well for Laversab Aviation Systems, as their pitot static testers and air data test sets will remain in high demand.

The aircraftmakers' confidence about the emerging world is based on what appears to be an iron law of aviation: rising numbers of urban middle-class people will mean rising demand for air travel, whatever short-term blips the economy suffers. Since the 1970s, through oil shocks, Middle East wars, terrorist attacks and disease outbreaks, the number of passenger-miles flown seems always to have snapped back to its long-term growth trend (see chart 1). At the moment Airbus reckons there are 39 "megacities" worldwide whose airports handle more than 10,000 long-haul passengers a day. In 20 years it expects there to be almost 90 such cities, many of them in Asia. In terms of the numbers of very large aircraft (like the A380) that they handle, the world's busiest hubs by then will be Dubai, Beijing Capital and Hong Kong, with Heathrow and JFK in fourth and fifth place.

There is still plenty of room for growth in the rich world too, but a second important driver of demand for new planes in these countries will be airlines' desire to save on fuel and maintenance costs, especially as new taxes on emissions come into force, by swapping their old crates for shiny new planes. Airbus points out that the industry has already been doing pretty well on this score: in the past ten years, passenger-miles flown have risen by 45% but the airlines' use of jet fuel has gone up by just 3%. In large part that is because of more efficient aircraft, and there are more such gains to come. Airbus says the re-engined "neo" version of its single-aisle A320 plane, due to fly in late 2015, will burn 15% less fuel than the current version. New engine designs and greater use of lighter composite materials in aircraft frames will mean even greater gains in efficiency.

Another reason for the airlines' greater fuel efficiency in recent years has been that they have been steadily getting better at filling their planes. Of all the many charts that flashed by during Airbus's presentation on Monday, the one that most caught my eye was this one (chart 2), showing how planes were typically only half-full in the 1960s but now fly with more than three-quarters of the seats occupied. Surely there is scope for further improvement in the coming years, as long as the airlines do not let their capacity get too far ahead of demand. As passengers clamour for seats, airlines will switch to ever bigger planes, which are more fuel-efficient than smaller ones. Singapore Airlines, the launch customer for the giant A380, is said to be filling over 80% of the available seats on it.

So the long-term future for aviation looks bright. As for the short term, IATA, the body that represents almost all of the world's scheduled airlines, said on September 20th that air travel was holding up unexpectedly well despite the worsening economic worries and continuing high fuel prices. It expects the number of passenger-miles flown to increase by almost 6% this year, whereas back in June it was expecting only 4.4% growth. As a result, IATA expects airlines to make combined net profits this year of just under $7 billion, compared with the $4 billion forecast in June.

Whether this is cause for celebration or a shrugging of the shoulders depends on how you look at it. IATA points out that this year's expected profits represent a slender 1.2% margin on the airlines' combined revenues of almost $600 billion. This year's $7 billion is a sizeable fall from last year's record profits of almost $16 billion, and IATA expects a further reduction in 2012, to around $5 billion. On the other hand, airlines have been such chronically poor financial performers—they lost money in seven of the last ten years—that to clock up any sort of profit in current conditions seems an achievement by comparison.

Thursday, September 11, 2014

Environmental Issues for Aviation

Like any other form of public mass transport that relies on finite planetary resources, aviation cannot (in its present form) be considered sustainable in the very long term. Because of the finite nature of the resources upon which aviation relies, it is more realistic in the medium term to think how best to improve the sustainability of air transport rather than it achieving sustainable development. Laversab Aviation Systems is incredibly concerned with the nature of environmental issues for aviation. That is why they put so much focus in developing pitot-static systems that not only function efficiently and effectively, but which are manufactured in an environmentally-friendly fashion.

Demand for air transport is continually growing and, if this demand is to be met with all the attendant benefits, society must also accept the costs (noise, pollution, climate change, risk, resource use etc). Whilst it is not possible to make aviation sustainable (in its present form) in the very long term, much can be and is being done to improve aviation’s sustainability including:

  • ensuring safety and security;
  • efficiently optimising available capacity;
  • collaborating to achieve a shared vision for more sustainable aviation;
  • making decisions based on optimising the balance between social, economic and environmental imperatives;
  • serving the need for mobility in a manner where the greatest overall benefit will arise, meeting the needs of stakeholders;
  • taking every opportunity to minimise adverse impacts and resource use by creating and operating more efficient ATM systems, equipment and technology;
  • targeting efforts where they will produce the greatest improvement in our citizen’s quality of life;
  • investing in adequate research, training, education and awareness;
  • being transparent and honest about both the good and bad aspects of air transport;
  • avoid conflicting policy and regulations.